... | ... | @@ -253,9 +253,6 @@ Based on code presented in [the lesson plan](http://legolab.cs.au.dk/DigitalCont |
|
|
We would have attempted to amend the inaccurate angle calculation and then use this as a means of creating a balancing robot using the gyro sensor, but at this point we had simply spent too much time on the exercises and were forced to cut our gyro implementation short and leave it at this. Had we had the time to continue, our ideas regarding the implementation of a balancing robot included combining the different sensors to have a form of "second opinion" to take into account when responding to the gyro sensor's readings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
(TODO alle: SKRIV MERE KONKLUSION TIL LIGHT SENSOR)
|
|
|
(Nicolai: Wrote some, ved ikke om det er fint)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, we should note that we were far from completing our goal of finishing the exercises within five hours. We will take this into account in the following lessons, either by allotting more time or by planning the exercises in more detail and sticking to a stricter plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using Hurbain's three suggestions for optimizing the conditions for the robot to act in resulted in one particular main insight that could be especially useful later, which is that the calibration angle has significant impact on the robot's ability to balance and must take into account the weight distribution of the robot's physical appearance. Later experiments with the PID paramters also showed the significant influence that the these have on the robot's ability to respond to physical conditions.
|
... | ... | |