... | ... | @@ -101,15 +101,15 @@ Next, we constructed vehicle 2b by simply switching the attachments of the conne |
|
|
[TODO: LIGHT LOOOVE / Light luvver vid]
|
|
|
*Video 9: The robot driving towards bright light*
|
|
|
|
|
|
We did not create similar programs that cause the robot to have inhibitory connections, but they would be reasonably trivial. By simply inverting the values used as parameters for the motor powers, the robot would now have inhibitory connections, which would cause the robot to instead stand still in high lighting environment, and drive towards dark (low light) sources.
|
|
|
We did not create similar programs with inhibitory connections, but they would be reasonably trivial. It could be obtained simply by inverting the values used as parameters for the motor powers. This would cause the robot to stand still when measuring bright light and drive towards dark (low light) sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Behavior of several robots with candle on the ass in a dark room
|
|
|
TODO: Formulér: Behavior of several robots with candle on the ass in a dark room
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Situation | Explanation |
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
|
| 2a Exitatory | Every time a robot gets close to another, they would drive away from eachother |
|
|
|
| 2a Inhibitory | The robots would stop when getting close to another, and start again when they drive away, so the end result is the robots following eachother |
|
|
|
| 2b Exitatory | Same behavior as 2a Inhibitory (Pending godlike Camilla forklaring) |
|
|
|
| ------------- | ----------- |
|
|
|
| 2a Exitatory | Every time a robot gets close to another robot, it drives away from the other one |
|
|
|
| 2a Inhibitory | The robots stop when getting close to another robot and start again when the other drives away. The end result is the robots following each other |
|
|
|
| 2b Exitatory | Same behavior as 2a Inhibitory (TODO: Pending godlike Camilla forklaring) |
|
|
|
| 2b Inhibitory | Same behavior as 2a Exitatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In our experiments so far we have included the entire range of raw light values from 0 to 1023 in our mapping calculations. This has not been a massive problem given the light environment we were in, but could be improved by adapting our calculations to include the maximum and minimum light values sensed during execution of our programs, and using these values as the mapping range in our calculations, similar to Tom Deans suggests in [2].
|
... | ... | |