... | @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ The results showed the robot turn 180 degrees and stop with the pointer touching |
... | @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ The results showed the robot turn 180 degrees and stop with the pointer touching |
|
[![image alt text](http://img.youtube.com/vi/eNhb2zsw7ao/0.jpg)](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNhb2zsw7ao)
|
|
[![image alt text](http://img.youtube.com/vi/eNhb2zsw7ao/0.jpg)](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNhb2zsw7ao)
|
|
##### Fig. 23 - Showing the robot turning and stopping at almost exactly 180 degree.
|
|
##### Fig. 23 - Showing the robot turning and stopping at almost exactly 180 degree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In [4] it is described that "With proper adjustment of these parameters, errors in distance traveled and angle of rotation can be held to 2% or perhaps less". See if this can be achieved.
|
|
In the leJOS documentation it is described that "With proper adjustment of these parameters, errors in distance traveled and angle of rotation can be held to 2% or perhaps less". See if this can be achieved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our values and test drives reveals an error of 1.8%, (50.8 cm / 50 cm * 100 )- 100 = 1.8 % error.
|
|
Our values and test drives reveals an error of 1.8%, (50.8 cm / 50 cm * 100 )- 100 = 1.8 % error.
|
|
|
|
|
... | | ... | |