- 19 Nov, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
This new lemma, contract_centric, restates proofs about single contracts over some other sufficient lemmas involving strongly typed versions of deployment info, state and messages. This makes proving those kind of theorems much easier.
-
- 18 Nov, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 13 Nov, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 05 Nov, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 04 Nov, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 31 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
If the facts are wrong then this case will go wrong so it should be proven first by the user.
-
- 30 Oct, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
This lemma makes proving simple properties about the deployed contract state of a contract easier.
-
- 29 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
Also use these from Congress.v
-
- 28 Oct, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 25 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 15 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 13 Oct, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
Contracts cannot create blocks and balance of undeployed contract is 0
-
- 10 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 25 Jun, 2019 4 commits
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 24 Jun, 2019 8 commits
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
Remove it from the contract's perspective for now.
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 21 Jun, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
- No longer require that block reward can be computed from height. - Remove Chain's dependence on BlockHeader. Instead inline appropriate fields in Chain structure. - Change step_block to use a BlockHeader now instead of manually specifying all the fields. The new BlockHeader now additionally contains the creator and reward of that block, so step_block in effect contains the reward. - These refactorings means that the circulation proof changes. Introduce created_blocks to get list of blocks created by user, and prove instead that the circulation equals the sum of rewards in blocks. - Rename "baker" to a more general "creator" globally
-
- 17 Jun, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 14 Jun, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 13 Jun, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 11 Jun, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-
- 10 Jun, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
Versions are not used for anything and the comment is outdated.
-
- 07 Jun, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Botsch Nielsen authored
-