Grain decay appears to do nothing...
Created by: Lars Dalby
Imported comments:
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-31T13:06:56.149Z
closed
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-31T13:06:55.739Z
So a clear improvement to the fits. So the lack of response in the previous runs was due to a too high default for WC to grass scaler
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-31T12:31:08.385Z
Damn, a strange bug in the plot that I can't get rid off right now. Anyway we get this (ignore what looks like 100% grain usage in for barnies in sep.):
The fits are alright I think. But they are worse in this run compared to the previous one. So it looks like something is going wrong on grendel.
However the difference is not as big as you would expect. This must be due to the too high energetic value of WC. Let's set WC = grass and see what happens
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-31T09:38:42.104Z
This is likely to be an issue where the default for winter cereal to grass scaler being too high. So not matter how much grain there is, they eat WC.
This is a default run: Let's see what a run with a very high decay rate looks like.
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-31T07:59:49.191Z
marked this issue as related to #23 (closed)
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-31T07:57:05.475Z
This is running with a WC to grass scaler that should give a low fit (according to the latest param fit document where I believe we haven't subtracted 1 from the lsq) The fits shown here is when I subtract 1 from the fit!
And this is with a value that should give a high fit:
Have trawled the code to see if there is some odd place where the subtraction is going on, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Based on this and the plots above I think it is safe to conclude that it is not being done and should be.
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-30T20:36:22.001Z
Looks like this is switched around, so lower values for habuse fit is better, but still not showing any change which it should.
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-30T15:21:32.331Z
Have a better guess at the FL default now, so proceeding here.
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-29T15:49:04.793Z
We need a new sensible default for FL before we can really fix this
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-29T13:56:18.759Z
added ~3117938 and removed ~3117937 labels
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-29T13:45:42.243Z
Those values corresponds to these cfg values: 0.0995, 0.2786, 0.4577, 0.6368, 0.8159, 0.9950. This means that with the lowest of those, all grain is pretty much gone by day 3. This should really give us a response.
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-08T11:00:16.075Z
added ~3117941 label
By Lars Dalby on 2018-01-08T11:00:07.829Z
assigned to @LDalby