@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ We started by testing the robot and it fell!
...
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ We started by testing the robot and it fell!
We tried calibrating it up against the door (because this was the most even thing). We used a little angle (see video) because the robot has too much front weight. This worked more or less, but the robot clinged to the door (we made a door opener)
We tried calibrating it up against the door (because this was the most even thing). We used a little angle (see video) because the robot has too much front weight. This worked more or less, but the robot clinged to the door (we made a door opener)
We turned on the light - see video
We turned on the light - see video
We tried a stiber angle which worked much better - see video
We tried a stiber angle which worked much better - see video
We tried to get rid of the weight difference that came from the bouncing wires and therefore 'rebuild' the robot.
#### surface
#### surface
The light was on.
The light was on.
...
@@ -47,6 +48,12 @@ Did't work very weel.
...
@@ -47,6 +48,12 @@ Did't work very weel.
The conclusion of this experiment is that the biggest factor is the calibrating position/angle.
The conclusion of this experiment is that the biggest factor is the calibrating position/angle.
### Algorithm-discussion
We started by changing the int's to floats - 'cause Ole said so. Aaaaand this will give a more precise adjustment of the PID controller.
The next step seems to be changing the parameters, as Hurbain says that the values of the program are used from a calibration of his light sensor.
