@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ NB: The robot was casting shade, depending on the direction that the light was c
...
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ NB: The robot was casting shade, depending on the direction that the light was c
Was originally 28, in the code that we used as basis for our own.
Was originally 28, in the code that we used as basis for our own.
Using the grid search approach again, we first tried with 40 (robot falling forward a lot) and 10 (robot corrects too slowly but simply falls forward right away). We then tried 70, in which case the robot also kept falling a lot, but the corrections seemed more aggressive (which makes sense), causing it to oscillate violently.
Using the grid search approach again, we first tried with 40 (robot falling forward a lot) and 10 (robot corrects too slowly but simply falls forward right away). We then tried 70, in which case the robot also kept falling a lot, but the corrections seemed more aggressive (which makes sense), causing it to oscillate violently.
We changed the setpoint to 585 and tried values of p between 40 and 70, starting with 55.
