cvf06035 created page: home authored by Ida Larsen-Ledet's avatar Ida Larsen-Ledet
...@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ We tested the robot in the bathroom where he light could be totally switced off. ...@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ We tested the robot in the bathroom where he light could be totally switced off.
When we first placed the robot and tried to have it calibrate, it fell over almost immediately. When we first placed the robot and tried to have it calibrate, it fell over almost immediately.
##### start balancing - not effect of push ##### start balancing - not effect of push
We tried calibrating it up against the door (because this was the most even thing). We used a little angle (see video) because the robot has too much front weight. This worked more or less, but the robot clinged to the door (we made a door opener) We tried calibrating the robot while it was resting against the door to the bathroom, as the door was perpendicular to the floor and flat which. This allowed the robot to callibrate for a more steady, upright position - for instance this reduced the risk of us accidentally tilting the robot when pushing the start button after (during) calibration. We placed the robot so that it a small angle (see Video 2) as we judged that the robot had too much weight in the front because of its sensor. This worked more or less, but the robot clinged to the door (we made a door opener)
We turned on the light - see video We turned on the light - see video
We tried a stiber angle which worked much better - see video We tried a stiber angle which worked much better - see video
We tried to get rid of the weight difference that came from the bouncing wires and therefore 'rebuild' the robot. We tried to get rid of the weight difference that came from the bouncing wires and therefore 'rebuild' the robot.
... ...
......