From 5a6cd0eedd4fd570e5c39a73243293ff15353a8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederik Kold Knudsen <201505566@post.au.dk>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 13:50:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Comments from Frederik.

---
 micro-bit.md | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/micro-bit.md b/micro-bit.md
index c49661f..e27548f 100644
--- a/micro-bit.md
+++ b/micro-bit.md
@@ -22,4 +22,8 @@ The emulated Micro:BIT inside the software gave us mixed feelings. While it was
 In addition to these things, the software did a fairly good job of explaining what was actually going on, often with good explanations of both the code and the editor - though we feel that some things might benefit from a general explanation, I.e. the way a boolean is described.
 
 ### Henrik comments ###
-Nice summary and good connection to the literature. Consider adding a section with the references and/or use hyperlinks directly to the papers references.
\ No newline at end of file
+Nice summary and good connection to the literature. Consider adding a section with the references and/or use hyperlinks directly to the papers references.
+
+### Frederik comments ###
+I like the reflection on the litterature as well. Nice work! But I miss some argumentation/examples to your statements, from the exercise you did with Mirco:BIT. 
+I would add a references section too. 
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
GitLab